Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Xm vs. iPod  (Read 2616 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

B.A.

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
Re: Xm vs. iPod
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2012, 10:14:59 PM »

I had xm on my bike for many years.  I don't have it anymore and. Don't even miss it. Ifi want radio I'll play the radio.. If I want music I'll use the iPod or pandora.  Both seem better than xm to me anyway.   :nixweiss:  xm is almost like listening to regular fm anyway.  Some of those jockeys will never shut up.  I don't even use it that much in my car anymore either.  Definitely  over rated.

Amen.  My iPod (FLTRUSE) is failing regularly.  Listening to xm for the first time in awhile.  Classic Rewind I think.  Chick WOULD NOT SHUT UP!!!!  SHEEESH!!!

Gonna go vote now!! :huepfenlol2:
Logged

Jerry/MD

  • Guest
Re: Xm vs. iPod
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2012, 04:55:05 PM »

Amen.  My iPod (FLTRUSE) is failing regularly.  Listening to xm for the first time in awhile.  Classic Rewind I think.  Chick WOULD NOT SHUT UP!!!!  SHEEESH!!!

Gonna go vote now!! :huepfenlol2:

Precisely why I dropped XM last year. That and you would think the 'pay to play' music stations, especially the Classic Rock offerings, would play a wider variety of songs. Heck no!!! They play the same tired set of hits from the same artists as the free over the air stations. I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard the song 'Bad Company'.  :'(

Ok....I feel better.  ;)
Logged

hdnut

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 624
Re: Xm vs. iPod
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2012, 07:19:05 PM »

I can play the Ipod for over 8 hours and not hear the same song! Sweet!!! But in my truck on the way home from northern Wis. on Sunday afternoons I would not trade my XM and being able to listen to the STEELERS games!!!! PRICELESS!!!!!! :orange: :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
hdnut
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 25 queries.